The following is a guest contribution by Sam Aaron, Research Director for the South Carolina Policy Council
South Carolina’s education system is showing modest but measurable signs of improvement. Incremental gains at both the local and state levels suggest forward momentum, but an important question remains: how do voters feel about public education overall?
To gauge public sentiment, the South Carolina Policy Council conducted a statewide poll of 1,200 registered voters. The results offer insight into voters’ satisfaction with public education and the issues they view as most pressing.
A plurality of South Carolina voters report being satisfied with the quality of K-12 public education in the state. According to the poll, 46% of respondents said they are satisfied, while 38% are dissatisfied and 16% are unsure.
Voters were also asked to identify their biggest concern about South Carolina’s public schools. Their responses were as follows:
- Academic quality and standards (25%)
- School safety (23%)
- Curriculum content emphasizing social or political views over core academic subjects (20%)
- Teacher quality (11%)
- No major concerns about public schools (8%)
- Parental transparency and involvement (6%)
- Unsure (4%)
- Use of district-issued devices in the classroom (3%)
- Something else (2%)
Academic quality and standards emerged as the top concern among voters, followed by school safety. In response, the General Assembly is considering several proposals aimed at strengthening academic rigor.
One such proposal is S.537, filed by Sen. Jeff Zell, R-Sumter, which would prohibit the use of grading floors in South Carolina schools.
While their application varies, grading floors generally require teachers to assign a minimum quarterly or semester score to students (often 50 or 60 out of 100), even when assignments are missing, incomplete, or demonstrate little mastery of the subject matter. Banning this practice would ensure students’ grades more accurately reflect their academic performance.
Voters expressed broad support for the proposal. 54% said they support banning grading floors, while 30% said they oppose the measure, and 16% said they were unsure.
When it comes to transparency and freedom in education, voters across demographics and the political spectrum demonstrated massive support for transparency in education. Voters were asked, “How important is it to you that South Carolina parents have the right to review school curricula, access their child’s educational records, and choose between public, private, or homeschool options without state interference?”
The responses were overwhelmingly clear: 82% said it was important, 7% said it was not, and 4% were unsure.
The use of district-issued electronic devices has become a more contentious issue in recent years, driven by the shift toward more screen-based learning during and after COVID-19. Voters were asked whether they agree or disagree with issuing laptops or digital devices to students in South Carolina public schools for educational purposes.
Voters generally support the practice, with more than three-quarters agreeing that providing devices for educational use is appropriate.
The message from voters is clear: academic quality is the top priority, followed closely by school safety. Improving educational standards, ensuring transparency, and making effective use of technology remain central concerns.
Voters also strongly favor parental empowerment, both in choosing the educational option that best fits their child’s needs and in reviewing classroom materials with minimal state interference.
For readers interested in full crosstabs or additional polling data on issues such as taxes, energy, and judicial reform, the complete poll release is available on the South Carolina Policy Council’s website.
***
Sam Aaron is the Research Director at the South Carolina Policy Council, an independent, nonpartisan group dedicated to promoting limited government, individual liberties, free markets, and traditional South Carolina values.